OfSted and NQTs – Who watches the Watchmen?
The following for those who haven’t already read the article is from The Guardian 04-06-14:
From Monday, Ofsted will send inspectors to inspect trainees’ teaching in the autumn term as they start work as newly-qualified teachers.
Previously, Ofsted only inspected trainees in the summer of their training year. But the aim of the new plan is to ensure that new teachers implement what they have learnt while training in the classroom, particularly in managing behaviour and instilling discipline.
In a further change, inspectors will also judge whether teachers are dressed professionally and demonstrate professional conduct. While the inspectorate says it is not laying down a prescriptive uniform – ties will not be compulsory, it insists – it argues teachers should be dressed “in a way that befits their professional status”. Training providers who do not ensure trainees dress appropriately will be marked down.
Some teacher training providers have not prepared trainees adequately for their induction year, according to Ofsted. In a speech in January, chief inspector of schools in England, Michael Wilshaw, said Ofsted had “not been as demanding as it should have been with training providers who have sent newly-qualified teachers (NQTs) out into schools unprepared for the rigours of the classroom.”
Ofsted is particularly concerned that 40% of new teachers leave the profession within five years, with poor pupil behaviour cited as a key reason. The figure is a “national scandal”, Mr Wilshaw has said.
Sean Harford, Ofsted national director for initial teacher education, said the new two-stage inspection process would help raise standards, with further visits scheduled for those teachers needing support to improve. “Teaching is a tough yet very rewarding job. So it is important that the training new teachers receive is the best it can be. Trainees should learn how to promote good behaviour in the classroom so they can focus on teaching, and children and young adults can focus on learning.
“Through our new two-step inspection process we will make sure that teachers are putting into practice in the autumn what they learned in their training. I expect this new way of inspecting will help to raise standards. When we judge providers to require improvement or are inadequate we will support and challenge them to improve; we then will re-inspect them the following year.”
When judging teacher training providers, inspectors will now also have to evaluate how far they have tried to engage schools and colleges in challenging circumstances, including those deemed to require improvement, in training partnerships. They will examine whether teacher supply has increased as a result, particularly in areas of the country where recruitment is difficult.
So, in September OfSted will be specifically inspecting Newly Qualified Teachers to ‘ensure that they are applying their classroom learning of behaviour management and instilling discipline’. This will include professional dress and conduct.
Here’s an idea:
Let’s inspect and scrutinize some of the most vulnerable teachers, NQTs, you know the ones who need help and support to succeed in an incredibly challenging job.
Just as you start and before you can really secure your place – we will come in and check you are dressed right, speak right and can ‘deal with the pressures’ – that we have imposed.
I suspect there might even be a check that fingernails are clean and clipped and that hair is regulation length.
OK, so perhaps gold spangled hot pants are not quite right, but who is deciding? This has the potential to promote some very shallow values. Teachers should wear dress that ‘befits professional status’. This is incredibly subjective.
Where will they stand on tattoos and piercings?
Are ear-rings OK? For men and women?
What about a nose stud? Will that make someone an ineffective teacher?
I have tattoos, not visible and very small, but I know someone with a large tattoo on their arm.
They cover it, but it has been seen.
Is that ‘Inadequate’, Grade 4 dress or conduct? I think not.
This guy does a remarkable job promoting anti-bullying and anti-prejudice in schools – Michael Wilshaw would faint!?
I know another teacher who wears their PE kit, every day, whether or not they are teaching PE, does that mean they are not dressed in a way which befits their professional status?
As a recently qualified teacher some years ago, I experienced my first inspection. The Lead Inspector toured the school with the Head Teacher and commented to her something I have always remembered and admired:
“You have sure a wonderful range of individual teachers in your school. From the very experienced lady in Nursery to the young man with all the jewellery and bracelets (that was me by the way), it is lovely that your children get to see a variety of personalities.”
So, my wearing of 7 rings and 5 bracelets didn’t concern him, he liked it. Would this new regimen perhaps have frowned on it and ‘marked my training provider down’ for not teaching me what to put on in the morning?
I’m not sure that my College Tutor would’ve had the inclination to scrutinise my wardrobe.
I struggle to begin to express how terrifying this whole process is becoming.
In what sense does it help?
Mr Wilshaw tells us that:
‘…training providers have sent NQTs out into schools unprepared for the rigours of the classroom…’
We all know this.
NQTs know this.
Having your own class for the 1st time is terrifying. It is the first time that YOU are responsible for setting the climate for learning and not just adapting yourself into one that is already set by a teacher/school during your placements. It takes a little time. It is tough. We learn and we are taught by experienced colleagues, it is what we do and the vast overwhelming majority get it right.
Trainee teachers are not taught a great deal about behaviour management. That is why so many cite it when they choose to leave. I never found that learning about the work of child psychologists helped me very much – I know my Maslow, but have never really felt it was a tool for my practice.
Teachers don’t learn to be good at classroom and behaviour management in a tutorial or lecture. They do it through experience. If they are lucky they learn from good and outstanding teacher mentors during placements and from their colleagues in school. But it often takes a little time to find a way that works for the individual and develop a range of strategies which suit a range of different pupils.
We encourage children to make mistakes and build resiliency from it – but teachers don’t seem to be permitted to do it.
We take risks in being innovative with teaching methods and with new technologies and all is well, but if something doesn’t work there is the risk that if you are seen to go wrong – you have a problem and this absolutely should not be the case.
Sean Harford says that ‘…this will help raise standards…’.
Is this because OfSted is held in such high regard and that the teaching profession has so much faith in it?
If we want new innovative teachers to stick around – let’s support them. Let’s teach them, not scrutinize every move. That is why they leave!
Imagine if you will… it is Week 2 in September… OfSted are coming to inspect, not your school, but you.
Are you excited and looking forward to the prospect?
Are you filled with self-doubt, because now, it isn’t just about you, but your school, your job, your colleagues…?
Seems a little harsh to me.
If ‘poor pupil behaviour’ is cited as the primary reason – is this being addressed in ITT? And not just through relentless Ofsted edict.
Let us not say the pie tastes bad, when we haven’t carefully judged what the cook put in.
If the recipe is wrong, the food will taste bad.
Improve training on understanding pupil behaviour and managing it, then we can perhaps alleviate the pressure put on new teachers by preparing them for the real world inside their own classroom.
I have written about this before:
I worry that this design will not stem the tide of new teacher leaving within 5 years, it might make it 5 months!
What the teaching profession needs is a regular influx of new minds, fresh ideas and innovation.
While this is not provided solely by newly qualified teachers, they are a source of it and the NQTs of today are the Headteachers and School Leaders of tomorrow. They have enormous value. Why do we seek to undermine, under value and over scrutinise before they have had chance to show what they are capable of?
I would really like to know what are other peoples opinions on this.
Posted on 17/06/2014, in Behaviour, General, OfSted, T&L and tagged behaviour, classroom, education, Gove, Guardian, impact, inspection, Inspectors, ITT, judgements, leadership, learning, lesson, Newly Qualified, NQT, observation, ofsted, policy, Scary Guy, school, standards, support, Teachers, training, Wilshaw. Bookmark the permalink. 2 Comments.